Thursday, November 13, 2014

Historic FBI letter calls Martin Luther King an 'evil beast'

Historic FBI letter calls Martin Luther King an 'evil beast'

US civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. waves to supporters from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on August 28, 1963 in Washington, DC

© Provided by AFP US civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. waves to supporters from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on August 28, 1963 in Washington, DC
A vicious, hate-filled letter written by the FBI and sent to American civil rights champion Martin Luther King has been made public in full for the first time.
The single-paged anonymous letter was sent to King in 1964, calling him a "complete fraud and a great liability," an "evil, abnormal beast," and threatening to expose his marital infidelities in an apparent bid to make him commit suicide.
Heavily redacted copies of the letter have circulated for years but the New York Times on Wednesday published the note almost in its entirety, blanking out a woman's name.
The letter highlights the hostile attitude the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which was at the time run by J Edgar Hoover, had toward King and the civil rights movement.
According to the Times, it was written by one of Hoover's deputies, William Sullivan, and was apparently sent along with an audio recording containing evidence of King's extramarital affairs.
"Listen to yourself you filthy, abnormal animal," the letter reads. "You have been on the record -- all your adulterous acts, your sexual orgies extending far into the past. This one is but a tiny sample."
When King received the letter, he told friends that someone wanted him to kill himself, the Times reported.
The letter goes on to tell King: "There is only one thing left for you to do. You know what it is" -- an apparent exhortation for him to kill himself.
The letter was crafted to make it appear it came from someone within the civil rights movement, making a reference to "us Negroes."
"You could not believe in God and act as you do," the letter states. "Clearly you don't believe in any personal moral principles."
The document provides a compelling illustration of how deeply paranoid the FBI had become under the stewardship of Hoover, whose name still adorns the federal police agency's Washington headquarters.
Hoover believed King was being influenced by communists, and King accused the FBI of failures in stopping violence against blacks in the segregated Deep South.
In 1963, King famously made his "I Have a Dream" speech in Washington during an enormous rally in the nation's capital.
The march helped set the stage for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed major forms of racial discrimination, followed a year later by the Voting Rights Act, designed to guarantee the franchise for all black US citizens.
King was gunned down by a sniper in 1968.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Dead woman are not sexy, stop using them in advertising campaigns!

Dead woman are not sexy, stop using them in advertising campaigns!

we've got 19,066 signatures, help us get to 20,000
Dead is not sexy. It is not alluring, and it is definitely is not fashion. So you would think…
Marc Jacobs is not the first, but he certainly should be he last. His latest campaign features a femaale corpse, with two other models in close proximity.
A disturbing trend in fashion is emerging. Over the year’s female corpses, especially beautiful female corpses have become a staple of fashion shoots, advertising campaigns and TV shows, with sexual and fatal violence against women a favorite.
In an age where violence against woman has never been higher, do people actually want these images? Do they want violence against women to be sexualized?
This trend can hardly have gone further in illustrating fashion's fetishisation of the female corpse. And it is disgusting. 
This obsession with death isn't so surprising, when you consider it as the obvious and ultimate end point of a spectrum in which women's passivity and silence is sexualized, stylized and highly saleable. And this flies in the face of all women who have survived crimes committed against them, and all women who have throughout history struggled get rid of the passive housewife stigma to reach the heights that was once only attainable by men.
Sexualizing death and violence against woman in any circumstance is wrong,. Lets send a message to Marc Jacobs and the fashion industry in general. Stop this horrifically disturbing trend. Dead woman are not sexy, corpses are not sexy. Violence against woman is not sexy. Stop it now!

you have the power to create change.


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

James Earl Ray: The Man Who Killed Dr. Martin Luther King

James Earl Ray: The Man Who Killed Dr. Martin Luther King


It's almost too perfect.
A racist petty criminal looking to make a name for himself stalks a well-protected black civil rights leader and finally slays him, then manages to make an almost-clean getaway — but not before dropping the murder weapon (with prints) and his personal radio with his prison ID engraved on it.
It's almost too perfect because nobody would be that stupid. It must be a CIA-FBI-White House plot. Has to be. There is no way that James Earl Ray, the high-school dropout, Army throw-away, petty thief could stalk Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., kill the most influential civil rights leader of the era and evade an international manhunt for more than two months, only to be busted by Scotland Yard going through a customs checkpoint he wasn't supposed to be at.
The Rev. Jesse Jackson says it's a plot: "I have always believed that the government was part of a conspiracy, either directly or indirectly, to assassinate Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.," he wrote in the forward to James Earl Ray's autobiography Who Killed Martin Luther King Jr.? Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and Atlanta Mayor Andrew Young believes the government was responsible for King's death, as well. "I've always thought the FBI might be involved in some way," he said. "You have to remember this was a time when the politics of assassination was acceptable in this country. It was during the period just before Allende's murder. I think it's na├»ve to assume these institutions were not capable of doing the same thing at home or to say each of these deaths (King and the two Kennedys) was an isolated incident by 'a single assassin.' It was government policy."
Even Dr. King's family believes that Martin was killed as the result of a conspiracy involving government officials. Dexter King met with the man convicted of killing his father and later said he believed Ray was not the shooter.
James Earl Ray, passport photo
James Earl Ray,
passport photo
There are two issues here that need to be examined. First, did James Earl Ray kill Dr. Martin Luther King in Memphis, Tennessee on April 4, 1968, and second, was the assassination the culmination of a conspiracy to silence the leader of America's non-violent civil rights and anti-war movement? There are a number of different possible answers. Perhaps Ray was a patsy for a wide-reaching conspiracy. Maybe he was in Memphis on April 4 but didn't fire the shot. It could be that he was an unwitting pawn in a plan that involved agents of the highest levels of government, up to and including the Johnson White House.
Or it could be that a black-hating sociopath with delusions of grandeur managed to get himself close enough to Dr. King to fire a shot with a scope-equipped high-powered rifle that would have dropped an elk at the same distance.
In comparison to the earlier assassination of President Kennedy, the questions surrounding the murder of Dr. King are a little more clear cut. Witnesses (for the most part) do not quibble on the number of shots fired, or from the originating area. There are few credible conspiracies that claim multiple gunmen, and no evidence that more than one person was on hand in Memphis that day who planned to kill King. Conspiracy theorists must base their accusations on the word of Ray, who pled guilty to the murder in return for a guarantee from Tennessee authorities not to seek the death penalty. Once sentenced to 99 years, Ray immediately began retracting and changing his story that he acted alone.
On the other hand, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Johnson Administration were clearly on the record in opposing King's resistance to the Vietnam War and J. Edgar Hoover wanted King disgraced or rendered impotent by any means necessary. The comments of Young and Jackson do not seem as alarmist when one examines the record of harassment, slander and abuse government bodies accumulated in their pursuit of Dr. King. If Hoover wanted King taken out of the picture, could he have authorized assassination? As history has shown, with J. Edgar Hoover, the ends justified the means.
So, who killed Dr. King? Was it a conspiracy? Or was it a single, angry young man acting on his own hatred that ended the life of one of America's greatest leaders? After thirty years of investigations, theories and speculation, the evidence has pretty much all been gathered and it is possible to draw a conclusion that satisfies the reasonable observer.

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, August 30, 2014

He Has a Dream

He Has a Dream

Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
WASHINGTON — As he has grown weary of Washington, Barack Obama has shed parts of his presidency, like drying petals falling off a rose.
He left the explaining and selling of his signature health care legislation to Bill Clinton. He outsourced Congress to Rahm Emanuel in the first term, and now doesn’t bother to source it at all. He left schmoozing, as well as a spiraling Iraq, to Joe Biden. Ben Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser, comes across as more than a messagemeister. As the president floats in the empyrean, Rhodes seems to make foreign policy even as he’s spinning it.
But the one thing it was impossible to imagine, back in the giddy days of the 2009 inauguration, as Americans basked in their open-mindedness and pluralism, was that the first African-American president would outsource race.
He saved his candidacy in 2008 after the “pastor disaster” with Jeremiah Wright by giving a daring speech asserting that racial reconciliation could never be achieved until racial anger, on both sides, was acknowledged. Half black, half white, a son of Kansas and Africa, he searchingly and sensitively explored America’s ebony-ivory divide.
He dealt boldly and candidly with race in his memoirs, “Dreams From My Father.” “In many parts of the South,” he wrote, “my father could have been strung up from a tree for merely looking at my mother the wrong way; in the most sophisticated of Northern cities, the hostile stares, the whispers, might have driven a woman in my mother’s predicament into a back-alley abortion — or at the very least to a distant convent that could arrange for adoption. Their very image together would have been considered lurid and perverse.”
Now the professor in the Oval Office has spurned a crucial teachable moment.
He dispatched Eric Holder to Ferguson, and deputized Al Sharpton, detaching himself at the very moment when he could have helped move the country forward on an issue close to his heart. It’s another perverse reflection of his ambivalent relationship to power.
He was willing to lasso the moon when his candidacy was on the line, so why not do the same at a pivotal moment for his presidency and race relations? Instead, he anoints a self-promoting TV pundit with an incendiary record as “the White House’s civil rights leader of choice,” as The Times put it, vaulting Sharpton into “the country’s most prominent voice on race relations.” It seems oddly retrogressive to make Sharpton the official go-between with Ferguson’s black community, given that his history has been one of fomenting racial divides, while Obama’s has been one of soothing them.
The MSNBC host has gone from “The Bonfire of the Vanities” to White House Super Bowl parties. As a White House official told Politico’s Glenn Thrush, who wrote on the 59-year-old provocateur’s consultation with Valerie Jarrett on Ferguson: “There’s a trust factor with The Rev from the Oval Office on down. He gets it, and he’s got credibility in the community that nobody else has got.”
Sharpton has also been such a force with New York’s mayor, Bill de Blasio, in the furor over the chokehold death of a black Staten Island man that The New York Post declared The Rev the de facto police commissioner. The White House and City Hall do not seem concerned about his $4.7 million in outstanding debt and liens in federal and state tax records, reported by The Post. Once civil rights leaders drew their power from their unimpeachable moral authority. Now, being a civil rights leader can be just another career move, a good brand.
Thrush noted that Sharpton — “once such a pariah that Clinton administration officials rushed through their ribbon-cuttings in Harlem for fear he’d show up and force them to, gasp, shake his hand” — has evolved from agitator to insider since his demagoguing days when he falsely accused a white New York prosecutor and others of gang-raping a black teenager, Tawana Brawley, and sponsored protests against a clothing store owned by a white man in Harlem, after a black subtenant who sold records was threatened with eviction. A deranged gunman burned down the store, leaving eight people dead.
Sharpton also whipped up anti-Semitic feelings during the Crown Heights riots in 1991, denouncing Jewish “diamond dealers” importing gems from South Africa after a Hasidic Jew ran a red light and killed a 7-year-old black child. Amid rioting, with some young black men shouting “Heil Hitler,” a 29-year-old Hasidic Jew from Australia was stabbed to death by a black teenager.
Now, Sharpton tells Thrush: “I’ve grown to appreciate different roles and different people, and I weigh words a little more now. I’ve learned how to measure what I say.”
Obama has muzzled himself on race and made Sharpton his chosen instrument — two men joined in pragmatism at a moment when idealism is needed.
We can’t expect the president to do everything. But we can expect him to do something.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Ferguson Images Evoke Civil Rights Era and Changing Visual Perceptions

Ferguson Images Evoke Civil Rights Era and Changing Visual Perceptions

Left, police officers detained a protester in Ferguson, Mo.; right, a police dog attacked a civil rights demonstrator in Birmingham, Ala., in May 1963.CreditLeft, Whitney Curtis for The New York Times; right, Bill Hudson, via Associated Press
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
Danny Lyon, one of the photographers whose work came to define the civil rights upheaval in the South in the 1960s, said he was struck on Thursday when he saw a news image from the racially torn suburb of Ferguson, Mo., showing four police officers arrayed in a phalanx.
In part, it was because Mr. Lyon had taken a picture in 1963 in Birmingham, Ala., that looked very much like it: four officers standing in front of a police car with rifles and helmets, in a city where highly publicized clashes between protesters and the police helped turn the tide of public opinion toward the civil rights movement. But the image from Ferguson, for all its formal similarities, could not have been more different. Today’s riot police officers were wearing military-style camouflage and carrying military-style rifles, their heads and faces obscured by black helmets and gas masks as they stood in front of an armored vehicle.
“It didn’t look like America. It looked like Soweto,” Mr. Lyon said, referring to the South African township that was a hotbed of protests against apartheid. “It looked like soldiers. And soldiers’ job isn’t to protect. Their job is to kill people and to be ready to die.”
Left, police officers stood guard outside a vandalized gas station and convenience store in Ferguson, Mo.; right, heavily armed members of the Alabama Highway Patrol in Birmingham in 1963. CreditLeft, Whitney Curtis for The New York Times; Right, Danny Lyon/Etherton Gallery
The photographs that have emerged during several days of unrest in Ferguson after the fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager by a police officer have drawn mournful comparisons to pictures of the Deep South in the 1960s or of more recent racial unrest, like the 1992 Los Angeles riots. But they have also prompted a flood of commentary about the differences half a century has made in the visual economy.
They have raised questions about whether photos have the same power now to sway public opinion and political will; about the increasingly sophisticated ways an image-saturated public reads a picture’s racial and political subtext; and about the rapid transformation of the protests, even more so than the Los Angeles riots or the Occupy movement, into a war of images. The war pits what appears to be a large-scale paramilitary police presence against crowds of African-American protesters walking with their hands raised in surrender — or people throwing things and looting.
The Philadelphia Daily News was a case in point in the speed with which 21st-century image parsing can occur. In the wee hours of Thursday morning — in response to readers’ comments on Twitter about a photo the newspaper had planned to run on its front page, showing an African-American protester in Ferguson about to hurl what looked like a firebomb — editors changed their minds and instead used a photograph of an African-American woman standing in front of police officers, holding a sign urging answers in the death of the teenager, Michael Brown.
An assistant city editor wrote on Twitter to those objecting to the first picture that they would be able to understand the whole story, in a “sympathetic treatment,” if they opened the paper. But a reader responded, “Yes, in ten-point font I can see the fine print, which is completely overwhelmed by the picture.”
In the civil rights era, the visual stamp of the movement was determined by newspapers and the nightly news. Today, the imagery one sees depends on the filters one uses. One person’s Twitter feed may be full of footage of police firing tear gas or of peaceful protesters with their hands up. But David J. Garrow, a historian at the University of Pittsburgh’s law school and the author of several books on the civil rights movement, noted that when he searched for images of Ferguson on Google, roughly half showed what appeared to be looting.
Continue reading the main storyVideo

Standoff in Ferguson

Standoff in Ferguson

For days after the death of Michael Brown, protesters faced off with the police as racially charged demonstrations gripped the streets of Ferguson, Mo.
 Video CreditBy Brent McDonald on Publish DateAugust 14, 2014. Image CreditScott Olson/Getty Images
Such images look “more like Watts in 1965 or Newark in 1967, not Birmingham in 1963 or Selma in 1965,” Dr. Garrow said. And historically, he said, such photos were “deadly when it came to white public opinion.”
In Ferguson, the police seem to be just as worried about the dominance of certain imagery. The city’s police chief, Thomas Jackson, said during a news conference Thursday that officials were meeting “to talk about not only the tactics but the appearance” of the police force, whose resemblance to American soldiers in Iraq or Afghanistan has quickly become a social media theme.
Some visual echoes of the 1960s, like the Ferguson police’s use of dogs, may be unintentional. (During the 1963 March on Washington, President John F. Kennedy forbade the use of dogs for crowd control, knowing how badly it would play.) But on the protesters’ side, there have been deliberate efforts to evoke the nonviolent protests of the civil rights era, like T-shirts with the slogan “I Am a Man,” borrowed from signs carried during the 1968 Memphis sanitation strike.
Diane McWhorter, the author of “Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama, the Climactic Battle of the Civil Rights Revolution,” said she also saw echoes of those signs in the protesters’ hands-up gesture, an instantly recognizable cue that seems to be both born of the quick-read Internet news cycle and able to shape it.
“In one case, it’s a kind of mass witness of personhood,” Ms. McWhorter said of the “I Am a Man” signs, “and in the other case, a mass witness of innocence. Those images are very powerful.”
Some historians see dangers in those visual echoes. Martin A. Berger, a professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and the author of “Seeing Through Race: A Reinterpretation of Civil Rights Photography,” said that while images of a protester throwing a firebomb or of the police spraying tear gas may start conversations, the historical associations can also distort public understanding.
“We can look at these pictures and say that Ferguson is the same as Los Angeles or Birmingham, because it looks the same,” Dr. Berger said. “But we have to ask not just, ‘What is the same?’ but also, ‘What are the ways in which America has changed?’ To just have another conversation that stops at the level of police brutality doesn’t really get us very far.”

Sphere: Related Content

Romow Web Directory

5 Star Blogs


The Weblog Directory

The Blog Directory


martin luther king fan fiction, malcolm x fan fiction, rev dr martin luther king jr, brother malcolm x shabazz, sister betty x shabazz, independent living movement, disabled civil rights movement, annie chapman, catherine eddoes, the lodger ripper murders, whitechapel ripper murders, jack the ripper whitechapel, dr jack reinhart, solve the ripper murders, disabled rights movement

RWI and Karen Cole

My Photo

Biography of GWI

Ghost Writer, Inc.

Karen Cole

Executive Director

My Articles Page

My Samples Page

Our Samples Page

Thank you for considering hiring our ghost writing services. Please visit our site at for more info about Ghost Writer, Inc. We perform affordable freelance copy writing, ghostwriting, copy editing, proofreading, analysis and full professional formatting for books, music lyrics, memoirs and screenplays, and we do many other writing-related services for reasonable prices. We now offer ghost writing services for music and lyrics of most types, for example. We also offer a links exchange service and many other pro services such as graphics and photography, literary agency, marketing, sales, promotions, publishing and/or optioning assistance. We may even be able to arrange a TV show, film, video or movie to be made from your book, and/or we can arrange professional services that present and pitch your work to major TV and film industry executives.

I have won awards for my journalism, poetry, short stories and articles. I am multiply published and have had my own novels, novellas, short stories and scripts published. I am currently working on “The Rainbow Horizon,” a humorous fiction novel set in a small town in Washington State. I have contributed to national and international magazines and newspapers, as well as a multitude of online publications.

I am always on the lookout for new projects and first time clients.


We are a professional, affordable freelance and contracted book, music, lyrics, screenplay and manuscript ghost writing service. We have authors, ghostwriters, copy editors, proofreaders, rewriters, coauthors, cowriters, graphics and CAD artists, publishing assistants, web developers, optioning assistants, TV, film, book and music producer contacts, etc.

We have access to writers and artists with decades of experience in a wide variety of areas, and we set out to both serve your best interests and make our own ways in the professional world of writing and the arts. We always ask for upfront payment, as we need to remain strictly professional. We will only consider speculative payments for certain celebrity projects that are very likely to sell.

If you deal with us, you will find warm and human professional conduct, as we help both first-time and current book authors ghost write or otherwise copy edit their books as our main services. We charge commensurate to your budget, without undercutting our own professional work, as much as humanly possible.

We ask you to consider our services by providing free samples of our work done on your preliminary writing. We provide phone contact and note taking when appropriate, and expert, experienced low to high end ghost writing in general. We also prefer to do our work over the Internet and Skype as much as humanly possible, although we will help to prepare entire books over the phone.

We have streamlined our website to accommodate the need for search engine optimization, and we have clients coming in on an irregular basis. You may enter this client stream by emailing
 . Your letter will be answered - and I will do my utmost to find someone on our team to assist you. When I am available, I will take on your job myself, giving you nothing but expert quality services.

If you have a great book idea, lyrics to write, a screenplay needing editing, illustrations you need done, or a manuscript marketing campaign that needs developed or created, please contact us right away. And thank you very much once again for considering hiring our splendid ghost writing services!


Executive Director and President of Ghost Writer, Inc., Karen Cole writes. GWI at is a renowned inexpensive and affordable professional freelance writers, book authors, ghost writers, copy editors, proofreaders, coauthors, manuscript rewriters, graphics and CAD, digital and other photographers, marketers, promoters, publishing/production assistance, and screenplay writers, editors, developers and analysts service.